GwG · Tax Advisor · Level 5 of 5

GwG for Tax Consultants: Complex case review

Complex case assessment: Ambiguous accounting and advisory circumstances

You appreciate a demanding client case with several possible explanations for recurring inconsistencies. You check the validity of booking documents, the consultation context and relevant sources without prematurely equated a tax error with a cash laundering result.

Training offer for Germany

Planned training time: 5 hours
Additional test: Voluntary · planned +60 minutes
After participation: Participation certificate and participation Badge

Interest in this training

View Test Option

Non-binding request to Timo Winkelbach. You can only select the additional exam if you wish.

Industry badge · 5 stars characterise the level of learning. This example image is not a personal proof and does not confirm passed examination.

Format and price for this level

Live online training

299 €

excluding VAT per participant and course

This level is offered as live online training.

Online examination included in the price

All prices exclude statutory VAT. The live training price depends on the level and date and will be confirmed before booking.

Payment via PayPal after your booking is confirmed.

Up-to-date training materials

Certificate of attendance and digital badge

The final examination is optional and takes place online. One attempt and one retake are included in the course price. Examination time is additional to learning time.

We use teaching case studies based on real practical questions. Individual advice on ongoing client matters is not provided during training.

Does this step fit you?

Who is the training for?

For experienced tax advisers, money laundering officers and professional managers for difficult client dealings.

What prior knowledge do you need?

Advanced knowledge and experience with complete client files; practical level or comparable level of knowledge.

Your concrete added value

You develop a differentiated reasoning that also withstands critical questions. This will identify the facts that bear the position, which counter-arguments exist and which additional information could make a reassessment necessary.

Weigh patterns of errors, explanations and legal limits

That's what you're working on in this training.

Developing competitive explanations
You examine a recurring booking pattern and first formulate several plausible explanations. Then you assign the supporting and conflicting documents to each statement and determine what open fact would be decisive for further evaluation.
Check the context and sources of advice
You separate findings from different mandates and examine their importance for the relevant reporting issues. Original standards, board notes and available case law are examined for their specific reference to the facts and limits of a transfer.
Give reasons for a qualified conclusion
You provide a technical opinion with counterposition and verifiable supporting documents. The evaluation focuses on whether the conclusion follows from existing facts, reveals uncertainty and describes the further need for clarification for the firm precisely.

Your learning goals

To systematically compare recurring accounting errors and alternative explanations.
In this respect, I would like to thank the rapporteur for his excellent report.
To examine sources and case law for concrete transferability.
To formulate a differentiated conclusion with counter-arguments.

From knowledge to a well-founded case solution.

Fictional practice case · Tax consultant

Unclean accounting or model that needs to be explained

Several companies book similar consultancy services, while evidence of performance and payment assignments remain incomplete. The client refers to organizational errors. Examine this statement and counter-arguments, take into account the respective advisory context and examine relevant case law, as far as it is available in the case.

In focus: Link ambiguous accounting information, mandate context and legal evaluation in a differentiated way.

Your Exercise

You write an opinion on an ambiguous client case and then react to a reasoned counterposition as well as an additional evidence submitted.

Your work result and proof of participation

A source-based assessment with a comparison of evidence, alternative explanations and clearly identified limits of the evaluation. After completing the training, you receive a participation certificate and a participation Badge for your sector and level.

How this relates to your daily work

You practice the professional preparation of particularly sensitive client decisions. The method supports a factual internal discussion, in which neither discharge arguments nor unexplained indications disappear behind a flat-rate evaluation.

Planned: 5 hours of training. With space for application.

The planned pure training time is 300 minutes. It includes knowledge transfer, application at the practice case and joint evaluation. Breaks are added. The data are planning values; we coordinate the concrete process before the training.

Knowledge & Classification: 60 minutes
Exercise & Application: 210 minutes
Evaluation & Transfer: 30 minutes

If you choose the optional additional exam, come 60 minutes The planned total time with examination is then 6 hours, plus breaks.

The final examination is optional and takes place online. One attempt and one retake are included in the course price. Examination time is additional to learning time.

Voluntary additional option · planned +60 minutes

You decide if you're going to take an additional exam.

Training is also possible without additional final examination. After completing your training you will receive a certificate of participation and a badge of participation. A proof of passing an examination requires successful participation in the voluntary supplementary examination.

Test format

Optional examination: Written case assessment with supporting documents and counterposition

Your exam task

You develop a reasoned preliminary assessment of a new situation and name the facts or sources that would change the outcome.

This is what the evaluation depends on.

Alternative explanations weighted by supporting documents
The mandate context and sources are taken into account in detail
Transparency of borders and clarification requirements

Documentation of the test performance

After passing the optional assessment, you receive a record of achievement for this level explicitly identified as an assessment credential.

Request training with additional examination

Participation and examination performance remain recognizable.

The personal proof explicitly indicates whether the participation or a passed voluntary supplementary examination is confirmed. The badge graphic shows the industry and level of learning; it is not in itself a proof of performance.

Information about certificate and Badge verification →

Your badge shows the training series, sector and learning level. Together with your personal certificate, you can make your completed training visible in your CV or career profile.

Learn more about certificates and badges →

Legal bases and technical sources at this stage

The training works with the following sources. They shall help to justify the practice decisions on the basis of the relevant rules.

Interested in GwG for tax consultants: Complex case review?

Your contact for the training request is Timo Winkelbach. You can reach him by e-mail to info@eu-aml.com or via the pre-filled request form.

Prepare training request

Series, industry and level are taken over. The request is non-binding.

View all five levels for tax consultants →