AMLR · Lawyers · Level 5 of 5

AMLR for lawyers: Complex case review

Weigh professional secrecy, transaction assistance and AMLR borderline cases

You develop a well-founded position on an ambiguous mandate, examine counter-arguments and distinguish reliable findings from questions that require further clarification of the facts or judicial investigation.

Training offer for Germany

Planned training time: 5 hours
Additional test: Voluntary · planned +60 minutes
After participation: Participation certificate and participation Badge

Interest in this training

View Test Option

Non-binding request to Timo Winkelbach. You can only select the additional exam if you wish.

Industry badge · 5 stars characterise the level of learning. This example image is not a personal proof and does not confirm passed examination.

Format and price for this level

Live online training

299 €

excluding VAT per participant and course

This level is offered as live online training.

Online examination included in the price

All prices exclude statutory VAT. The live training price depends on the level and date and will be confirmed before booking.

Payment via PayPal after your booking is confirmed.

Up-to-date training materials

Certificate of attendance and digital badge

The final examination is optional and takes place online. One attempt and one retake are included in the course price. Examination time is additional to learning time.

We use teaching case studies based on real practical questions. Individual advice on ongoing client matters is not provided during training.

Does this step fit you?

Who is the training for?

Experienced lawyers, law firms and specialists for demanding money laundering mandates.

What prior knowledge do you need?

In-depth knowledge of client testing and experience with complete case files; a safe handling of legal sources is required.

Your concrete added value

You train a technical justification that also withstands critical questions. The focus is on difficult transitions between areas of activity and information contexts, which cannot be convincingly processed with a mere yes-no selection.

Complex case assessment · Assess ambiguous engagements methodically

That's what you're working on in this training.

Distinguishing Mandates
You examine an order that combines legal advice, a possible process representation and participation in a transaction. For each information, you determine when and in what context it was obtained and which classification depends on it.
Check exceptions and counter-arguments
You work on the wording of the professional AMLR regulations and compare the German starting position. A first convincing argument is specifically confronted with a counterposition. The exercise requires explicitly to specify the conditions and limits of any claimed exception.
Jurisdiction and uncertainty
You develop a targeted search question and examine appropriate official decisions, as far as they are available for the case constellation. In doing so, you distinguish their actual subject from the desired transfer to the future AMLR framework and mark open legal issues.

Your learning goals

To analyse multi-part mandates and information sources separately.
To examine exceptions without a flat-rate reference to confidentiality.
Consider counter-arguments and differences in the comparative case.
To formulate a reasoned position with remaining uncertainties.

From knowledge to a well-founded case solution.

Fictional practice case · Lawyers

Advising on the dispute and subsequent capital transfer

A client has an assessment of a corporate dispute and then asks for participation in a capital transfer. A new document calls into question his previous statement. You will investigate changes of activity, information context and possible ways of action without premature determination.

In focus: Limits of occupational exceptions and source-based assessment.

Your Exercise

Make a balance note on two possible classifications. Show what additional fact would change the evaluation and name a search route for the remaining legal question. Then you defend your position in the technical discussion.

Your work result and proof of participation

A differentiated note with sources, counter-arguments, clarification requirements and a comprehensible preliminary conclusion.

How this relates to your daily work

You strengthen the ability to represent difficult cases vis-à-vis partners or internal auditors in an understandable manner. At the same time, you learn to openly document technical uncertainty and to work on it.

Planned: 5 hours of training. With space for application.

The planned pure training time is 300 minutes. It includes knowledge transfer, application at the practice case and joint evaluation. Breaks are added. The data are planning values; we coordinate the concrete process before the training.

Knowledge & Classification: 60 minutes
Exercise & Application: 210 minutes
Evaluation & Transfer: 30 minutes

If you choose the optional additional exam, come 60 minutes The planned total time with examination is then 6 hours, plus breaks.

The final examination is optional and takes place online. One attempt and one retake are included in the course price. Examination time is additional to learning time.

Voluntary additional option · planned +60 minutes

You decide if you're going to take an additional exam.

Training is also possible without additional final examination. After completing your training you will receive a certificate of participation and a badge of participation. A proof of passing an examination requires successful participation in the voluntary supplementary examination.

Test format

Optional performance test: written, complex case examination and technical meeting.

Your exam task

Prove your solution, present the strongest counterposition and explain the significance of your sources. The quality of argumentation and comprehensible examination are evaluated; an unresolved clear statement does not replace derivation.

This is what the evaluation depends on.

Derogation requirements checked precisely
Counter-arguments seriously appreciated
Sources and uncertainties transparent

Documentation of the test performance

After completing the training, you receive a participation certificate and a participation Badge for level 5. Passing the optional assessment is additionally documented by an assessment certificate.

Request training with additional examination

Participation and examination performance remain recognizable.

The personal proof explicitly indicates whether the participation or a passed voluntary supplementary examination is confirmed. The badge graphic shows the industry and level of learning; it is not in itself a proof of performance.

Information about certificate and Badge verification →

Your badge shows the training series, sector and learning level. Together with your personal certificate, you can make your completed training visible in your CV or career profile.

Learn more about certificates and badges →

Legal bases and technical sources at this stage

The training works with the following sources. They shall help to justify the practice decisions on the basis of the relevant rules.

Interested in AMLR for lawyers: Complex case review?

Your contact for the training request is Timo Winkelbach. You can reach him by e-mail to info@eu-aml.com or via the pre-filled request form.

Prepare training request

Series, industry and level are taken over. The request is non-binding.

View all five levels for lawyers →